The appropriate giving of credit can be a controversial subject in project like this. At NewsFetchers, for our code products, we do it with
a single global credits list.
This document explains a bit about how we process applications. The overarching principle is that as far as possible everyone who applies to be included should be treated equally, no matter in what way they contributed, or who they work for.
Not included would be running independent websites, partnerships, creating personals, using our website for or promoting them to your friends, and support through unofficial channels.
The edges are fuzzy, but they would be wherever you drew the line. One aim of these criteria is to keep the size of the list manageable.
It is possible to nominate someone else for inclusion, but we encourage people to nominate themselves. There are several good reasons for this - they can confirm they are not the same Julius A. who is already on there, they can tell us (for more complex names) how they like to be sorted, and they can write their own citation. So if you know someone who you think should be on the list, tell them about it.
This document explains a bit about how we process applications. The overarching principle is that as far as possible everyone who applies to be included should be treated equally, no matter in what way they contributed, or who they work for.
Who is eligible?
The agreed criteria, as posted at the bottom of Our Contributors page, is people who have "made a significant investment of time, with useful results, into NewsFetchers project-governed activities".What are 'NewsFetchers project-governed activities'?
Anything relating to the product in which the credits list appears, and over which the NewsFetchers organization has direct oversight. So that would include writing articles which is checked in to our base, quality assurance for our services, documentation, official localizations, user experience and visual design, and marketing and support through official channels.Not included would be running independent websites, partnerships, creating personals, using our website for or promoting them to your friends, and support through unofficial channels.
The edges are fuzzy, but they would be wherever you drew the line. One aim of these criteria is to keep the size of the list manageable.
What is a 'significant investment of time'?
We want to make sure that being on the list actually means something, which means in turn that you do actually have to have done something in order to get on it. There is not a hard and fast rule here, because of the widely varying nature of people's contributions. If you think you have invested a significant amount of time, apply and see if we agree. :-)How do I get added?
See the bottom of Our Contributors page, and click the email link there. Remember to include a citation.It is possible to nominate someone else for inclusion, but we encourage people to nominate themselves. There are several good reasons for this - they can confirm they are not the same Julius A. who is already on there, they can tell us (for more complex names) how they like to be sorted, and they can write their own citation. So if you know someone who you think should be on the list, tell them about it.